Missouri Defense Attorney Who was Filmed Groping Clients in Jail Interview Room, Courtroom, Avoids Disbarment

Missouri Supreme Court
Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Missouri. Google

The Missouri Supreme Court decided Tuesday not to disbar a defense attorney, who was caught on video groping six clients in a jail interview room, in a courthouse and while behind the wheel.

The 4-3 ruling to indefinitely suspend 86-year-old Dan K. Purdy will allow him to apply for reinstatement after a year, The Kansas City Star reported. A disciplinary hearing panel had recommended disbarment for the attorney.

Purdy Caught on Video Making Unwanted Sexual Advances Towards Clients

In the majority ruling, Judge George Draper acknowledged Purdy, who is based in Osceola, Missouri, had committed the assaults and severely faulted him for his conduct.

Video provided by the Vernon County Sheriff's Office showed Purdy making sexual advances in September 2020 toward four women in a jail interview room. The women later told officers that the touching and kissing was unwanted.

In March 2021, he was seen on video touching a clients' buttocks in a St. Clair County courtroom, although the client said in an affidavit that she believed Purdy didn't touch her inappropriately, according to the opinion.

Later that year, a client used her phone to record Purdy reach across the seat and touch her breast under her blouse as he was driving her in his vehicle. That client said the sexual contact was unwanted, the opinion said.

Draper wrote that Purdy, whose law license had already been suspended on an interim basis since December 2021, "fails to grasp the severity of his conduct or these charges." But Draper added that the discipline is consistent with what the court has issued in response to past sexual misconduct by lawyers. And he noted the discipline is more severe than Purdy's request that the court allow him to apply for reinstatement after six months.

Judge Fischer Slams Court Ruling, Says Age Shouldn't Be Taken into Consideration

Judge Zel Fischer blasted the court's decision in his dissent. "There may have been a time when a temporary suspension was an adequate punishment for sexually assaulting or harassing a client, vulnerable or otherwise," Fischer wrote. "But," he added, "in my view, that time is long gone."

In his dissent, Fischer wrote that age shouldn't be taken into consideration when determining appropriate punishment. The decision, Fischer said, made him "deeply distressed."